java.lang.Object
- software.amazon.awssdk.core.SdkRequest
- - software.amazon.awssdk.awscore.AwsRequest
  - - software.amazon.awssdk.services.bedrock.model.BedrockRequest
    - - software.amazon.awssdk.services.bedrock.model.CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest

All Implemented Interfaces:: SdkPojo, ToCopyableBuilder<CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder,CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest>

@Generated("software.amazon.awssdk:codegen")
public final class CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest
extends BedrockRequest
implements ToCopyableBuilder<CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder,CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest>

Nested Class Summary

Nested Classes
Modifier and Type Class Description

static interface CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder

Method Summary

All Methods Static Methods Instance Methods Concrete Methods
Modifier and Type	Method	Description
`static CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder`	`builder()`
`String`	`clientRequestToken()`	A unique, case-sensitive identifier to ensure that the operation completes no more than one time.
`Double`	`confidenceThreshold()`	The minimum confidence level for logic validation.
`boolean`	`equals(Object obj)`
`boolean`	`equalsBySdkFields(Object obj)`
`AutomatedReasoningCheckResult`	`expectedAggregatedFindingsResult()`	The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check.
`String`	`expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString()`	The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check.
`<T> Optional<T>`	`getValueForField(String fieldName, Class<T> clazz)`
`String`	`guardContent()`	The output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy.
`int`	`hashCode()`
`String`	`policyArn()`	The Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the Automated Reasoning policy for which to create the test.
`String`	`queryContent()`	The input query or prompt that generated the content.
`Map<String,SdkField<?>>`	`sdkFieldNameToField()`
`List<SdkField<?>>`	`sdkFields()`
`static Class<? extends CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder>`	`serializableBuilderClass()`
`CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder`	`toBuilder()`
`String`	`toString()`	Returns a string representation of this object.

Methods inherited from class software.amazon.awssdk.awscore.AwsRequest
overrideConfiguration

Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object
clone, finalize, getClass, notify, notifyAll, wait, wait, wait

Methods inherited from interface software.amazon.awssdk.utils.builder.ToCopyableBuilder
copy

- Method Detail
  - policyArn
```
public final String policyArn()
```
    The Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the Automated Reasoning policy for which to create the test.
    
    Returns:
    
    The Amazon Resource Name (ARN) of the Automated Reasoning policy for which to create the test.
  - guardContent
```
public final String guardContent()
```
    The output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy. This represents the foundation model response that will be checked for accuracy.
    
    Returns:
    
    The output content that's validated by the Automated Reasoning policy. This represents the foundation model response that will be checked for accuracy.
  - queryContent
```
public final String queryContent()
```
    The input query or prompt that generated the content. This provides context for the validation.
    
    Returns:
    
    The input query or prompt that generated the content. This provides context for the validation.
  - expectedAggregatedFindingsResult
```
public final AutomatedReasoningCheckResult expectedAggregatedFindingsResult()
```
    The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check. Valid values include: , TOO_COMPLEX, and NO_TRANSLATIONS.
    
    VALID - The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims.
    
    INVALID - The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy.
    
    SATISFIABLE - The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true.
    
    IMPOSSIBLE - Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
    
    TRANSLATION_AMBIGUOUS - Detected an ambiguity in the translation meant it would be unsound to continue with validity checking. Additional context or follow-up questions might be needed to get translation to succeed.
    
    TOO_COMPLEX - The input contains too much information for Automated Reasoning to process within its latency limits.
    
    NO_TRANSLATIONS - Identifies that some or all of the input prompt wasn't translated into logic. This can happen if the input isn't relevant to the Automated Reasoning policy, or if the policy doesn't have variables to model relevant input. If Automated Reasoning can't translate anything, you get a single NO_TRANSLATIONS finding. You might also see a NO_TRANSLATIONS (along with other findings) if some part of the validation isn't translated.
    
    If the service returns an enum value that is not available in the current SDK version, expectedAggregatedFindingsResult will return AutomatedReasoningCheckResult.UNKNOWN_TO_SDK_VERSION. The raw value returned by the service is available from expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString().
    Returns:
    
    The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check. Valid values include: , TOO_COMPLEX, and NO_TRANSLATIONS.
    
    VALID - The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims.
    
    INVALID - The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy.
    
    SATISFIABLE - The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true.
    
    IMPOSSIBLE - Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
    
    TRANSLATION_AMBIGUOUS - Detected an ambiguity in the translation meant it would be unsound to continue with validity checking. Additional context or follow-up questions might be needed to get translation to succeed.
    
    TOO_COMPLEX - The input contains too much information for Automated Reasoning to process within its latency limits.
    
    NO_TRANSLATIONS - Identifies that some or all of the input prompt wasn't translated into logic. This can happen if the input isn't relevant to the Automated Reasoning policy, or if the policy doesn't have variables to model relevant input. If Automated Reasoning can't translate anything, you get a single NO_TRANSLATIONS finding. You might also see a NO_TRANSLATIONS (along with other findings) if some part of the validation isn't translated.
    
    See Also:
    
    AutomatedReasoningCheckResult
  - expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString
```
public final String expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString()
```
    The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check. Valid values include: , TOO_COMPLEX, and NO_TRANSLATIONS.
    
    VALID - The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims.
    
    INVALID - The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy.
    
    SATISFIABLE - The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true.
    
    IMPOSSIBLE - Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
    
    TRANSLATION_AMBIGUOUS - Detected an ambiguity in the translation meant it would be unsound to continue with validity checking. Additional context or follow-up questions might be needed to get translation to succeed.
    
    TOO_COMPLEX - The input contains too much information for Automated Reasoning to process within its latency limits.
    
    NO_TRANSLATIONS - Identifies that some or all of the input prompt wasn't translated into logic. This can happen if the input isn't relevant to the Automated Reasoning policy, or if the policy doesn't have variables to model relevant input. If Automated Reasoning can't translate anything, you get a single NO_TRANSLATIONS finding. You might also see a NO_TRANSLATIONS (along with other findings) if some part of the validation isn't translated.
    
    If the service returns an enum value that is not available in the current SDK version, expectedAggregatedFindingsResult will return AutomatedReasoningCheckResult.UNKNOWN_TO_SDK_VERSION. The raw value returned by the service is available from expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString().
    Returns:
    
    The expected result of the Automated Reasoning check. Valid values include: , TOO_COMPLEX, and NO_TRANSLATIONS.
    
    VALID - The claims are true. The claims are implied by the premises and the Automated Reasoning policy. Given the Automated Reasoning policy and premises, it is not possible for these claims to be false. In other words, there are no alternative answers that are true that contradict the claims.
    
    INVALID - The claims are false. The claims are not implied by the premises and Automated Reasoning policy. Furthermore, there exists different claims that are consistent with the premises and Automated Reasoning policy.
    
    SATISFIABLE - The claims can be true or false. It depends on what assumptions are made for the claim to be implied from the premises and Automated Reasoning policy rules. In this situation, different assumptions can make input claims false and alternative claims true.
    
    IMPOSSIBLE - Automated Reasoning can’t make a statement about the claims. This can happen if the premises are logically incorrect, or if there is a conflict within the Automated Reasoning policy itself.
    
    TRANSLATION_AMBIGUOUS - Detected an ambiguity in the translation meant it would be unsound to continue with validity checking. Additional context or follow-up questions might be needed to get translation to succeed.
    
    TOO_COMPLEX - The input contains too much information for Automated Reasoning to process within its latency limits.
    
    NO_TRANSLATIONS - Identifies that some or all of the input prompt wasn't translated into logic. This can happen if the input isn't relevant to the Automated Reasoning policy, or if the policy doesn't have variables to model relevant input. If Automated Reasoning can't translate anything, you get a single NO_TRANSLATIONS finding. You might also see a NO_TRANSLATIONS (along with other findings) if some part of the validation isn't translated.
    
    See Also:
    
    AutomatedReasoningCheckResult
  - clientRequestToken
```
public final String clientRequestToken()
```
    A unique, case-sensitive identifier to ensure that the operation completes no more than one time. If this token matches a previous request, Amazon Bedrock ignores the request, but does not return an error.
    
    Returns:
    
    A unique, case-sensitive identifier to ensure that the operation completes no more than one time. If this token matches a previous request, Amazon Bedrock ignores the request, but does not return an error.
  - confidenceThreshold
```
public final Double confidenceThreshold()
```
    The minimum confidence level for logic validation. Content that meets the threshold is considered a high-confidence finding that can be validated.
    
    Returns:
    
    The minimum confidence level for logic validation. Content that meets the threshold is considered a high-confidence finding that can be validated.
  - toBuilder
```
public CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder toBuilder()
```
    Specified by:
    
    toBuilder in interface ToCopyableBuilder<CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder,CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest>
    
    Specified by:
    
    toBuilder in class BedrockRequest
  - builder
```
public static CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder builder()
```
  - serializableBuilderClass
```
public static Class<? extends CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest.Builder> serializableBuilderClass()
```
  - hashCode
```
public final int hashCode()
```
    Overrides:
    
    hashCode in class AwsRequest
  - equals
```
public final boolean equals(Object obj)
```
    Overrides:
    
    equals in class AwsRequest
  - equalsBySdkFields
```
public final boolean equalsBySdkFields(Object obj)
```
    Specified by:
    
    equalsBySdkFields in interface SdkPojo
  - toString
```
public final String toString()
```
    Returns a string representation of this object. This is useful for testing and debugging. Sensitive data will be redacted from this string using a placeholder value.
    
    Overrides:
    
    toString in class Object
  - getValueForField
```
public final <T> Optional<T> getValueForField(String fieldName,
                                              Class<T> clazz)
```
    Overrides:
    
    getValueForField in class SdkRequest
  - sdkFields
```
public final List<SdkField<?>> sdkFields()
```
    Specified by:
    
    sdkFields in interface SdkPojo
  - sdkFieldNameToField
```
public final Map<String,SdkField<?>> sdkFieldNameToField()
```
    Specified by:
    
    sdkFieldNameToField in interface SdkPojo

Class CreateAutomatedReasoningPolicyTestCaseRequest

Nested Class Summary

Method Summary

Methods inherited from class software.amazon.awssdk.awscore.AwsRequest

Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object

Methods inherited from interface software.amazon.awssdk.utils.builder.ToCopyableBuilder

Method Detail

policyArn

guardContent

queryContent

expectedAggregatedFindingsResult

expectedAggregatedFindingsResultAsString

clientRequestToken

confidenceThreshold

toBuilder

builder

serializableBuilderClass

hashCode

equals

equalsBySdkFields

toString

getValueForField

sdkFields

sdkFieldNameToField